<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mundell.org &#187; Lightroom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mundell.org/archives/lightroom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mundell.org</link>
	<description>A little of this, a little of that</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 23:12:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Photo presentation in Firefox vs. Safari</title>
		<link>http://www.mundell.org/2007/09/06/photo-presentation-in-firefox-vs-safari/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mundell.org/2007/09/06/photo-presentation-in-firefox-vs-safari/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 04:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carrick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lightroom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mundell.org/2007/09/06/photo-presentation-in-firefox-vs-safari/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was shocked, shocked! to discover recently that my beloved Firefox appeared to be reinterpreting the color and exposure of my photos when I viewed them online. The strange thing was that I noticed  the difference in Firefox only when viewing my own photos on Flickr, then on my website (this one you&#8217;re reading [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was shocked, shocked! to discover recently that my beloved Firefox appeared to be reinterpreting the color and exposure of my photos when I viewed them online. The strange thing was that I noticed  the difference in Firefox only when viewing my own photos on Flickr, then on my website (this one you&#8217;re reading now). Examples: here is a sample of how a recent photo of my daughter Julia looks on Flickr when viewed with Safari:</p>
<p><img src="http://www.mundell.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/julia_capturesafari.jpg" alt="Julia as seen by Safari" /></p>
<p>And this is the same photo as seen by Firefox:</p>
<p><img src="http://www.mundell.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/julia_captureff.jpg" alt="Julia as seen by Firefox" /></p>
<p>Safari&#8217;s rendering is exactly how it should look. Firefox both brightens the exposure and softens the colors.</p>
<p>Another example, and this is the one where I first noticed the problem. Here is a photo taken specifically to highlight the bright red color. This is how it looks in Safari:</p>
<p><img src="http://www.mundell.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/redcaptuersafari.jpg" alt="Red as seen by Safari" /></p>
<p>And here it is in Firefox:</p>
<p><img src="http://www.mundell.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/redcaptureff.jpg" alt="red as seen by Firefox" /></p>
<p>The reds are much more muted in Firefox and it looks like a completely different exposure. Safari comes much closer to the original.</p>
<p>So what&#8217;s going on? Why do I only notice this for some of my own photos? Well, I think it must have to do with my photographic workflow. The photos above were taken in RAW format with my Nikon D50. I imported them into Adobe Lightroom, played around with the exposure and color a bit, then exported them to JPEG. There must be something about the process that messes with Firefox&#8217;s little brain and causes it to reinterpret how the images should look.</p>
<p>At least, that&#8217;s my guess. Does anyone have details on what this effect is and how to overcome it?</p>
<p>In the meantime, I&#8217;m considering switching to Safari when looking at photos online. It seems to most accurately present a photo as it is meant to be seen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mundell.org/2007/09/06/photo-presentation-in-firefox-vs-safari/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
